信箱裡面發現的 不曉得是哪一科的作業@@
April許珮綺91XXXXXX
After long time of contemplation, I found the following similiarties between the two articles.
1. oppostion to the current policy:Barro argues that U.S. governement should legalize drugs instead of supplying moeny to Colombia. On the other hand, Becker argues that estate taxes must be abandoned because human capital has replaced the tangible wealth and becomes the major source of inequality of opportunity.
2. disagreement with the officials: . Barro mentions the name of Barry McCaffrey, and Becker writies "President Clinton is likely to veto any bill that eliminates the estate tax entirely." From these crude comments, it's not hard to tell that he authors disagree not only to the current policies but also with the officials explicitly.
3.fail to achieve its goal: Of course, the reason why Barro and Becker recommend different ways of managing the problems is because the original methds fail to achieve their goals. Since human capital has replaced estates and becomes the chief origin of unequal opportunities, estates lose its function to balance the distribution of wealth among people of varied social classes. Becker also states that "Plan Colombia" would not succeed because Amercian consumers of Colombia's drugs continually send money to the guerrillas, and even if drug trade is wiped out from some areas, it will still be transferred to other places or countries.
4. waste of the existing resources: In the article about estate taxes, it is pointed out that
"trust and esate law is the specialty of almost 20,000 lawyers in America, who, along with many tax accountants, spedn their high-priced time searching for loopholes to avoid these tax rates", which suggests that human resources of legal profession are wasted. And in the other article, the author asserts legalizing drugs " would not only raise tax revenues but would also save enormous resources presently expended on police and prisons." That is, the resources used for prohibiting and controlling the use and circulation of drugs.
5.examples: In order to testify for the ways they come up to deal with the existing problems, the authors provide examples as follows. Becker declares it shows the harmful effects of the estate tax that many coutnreis have much lower estate taxes than the U.S. and a few do not even tax bequests to close family members. Barro says that "the U.S. does not have schemes like Plan Colombia for countries that produce tobacoo or alcohol but for those produce cocaine/marijuanna/heroin" because the latter substances are illegal.
6. correctants: Correctants are offered to facilitate their own propositions. Barro proposes publicly funded school vouchers to children in families that are not rich and head-strat programs for poorer children, while
Becker suggests that the money economized from discontinuing the financial aid to Colombia could be used to fund health programs for drug users and education programs designed to diminish the demand for drugs.
April許珮綺91XXXXXX
After long time of contemplation, I found the following similiarties between the two articles.
1. oppostion to the current policy:Barro argues that U.S. governement should legalize drugs instead of supplying moeny to Colombia. On the other hand, Becker argues that estate taxes must be abandoned because human capital has replaced the tangible wealth and becomes the major source of inequality of opportunity.
2. disagreement with the officials: . Barro mentions the name of Barry McCaffrey, and Becker writies "President Clinton is likely to veto any bill that eliminates the estate tax entirely." From these crude comments, it's not hard to tell that he authors disagree not only to the current policies but also with the officials explicitly.
3.fail to achieve its goal: Of course, the reason why Barro and Becker recommend different ways of managing the problems is because the original methds fail to achieve their goals. Since human capital has replaced estates and becomes the chief origin of unequal opportunities, estates lose its function to balance the distribution of wealth among people of varied social classes. Becker also states that "Plan Colombia" would not succeed because Amercian consumers of Colombia's drugs continually send money to the guerrillas, and even if drug trade is wiped out from some areas, it will still be transferred to other places or countries.
4. waste of the existing resources: In the article about estate taxes, it is pointed out that
"trust and esate law is the specialty of almost 20,000 lawyers in America, who, along with many tax accountants, spedn their high-priced time searching for loopholes to avoid these tax rates", which suggests that human resources of legal profession are wasted. And in the other article, the author asserts legalizing drugs " would not only raise tax revenues but would also save enormous resources presently expended on police and prisons." That is, the resources used for prohibiting and controlling the use and circulation of drugs.
5.examples: In order to testify for the ways they come up to deal with the existing problems, the authors provide examples as follows. Becker declares it shows the harmful effects of the estate tax that many coutnreis have much lower estate taxes than the U.S. and a few do not even tax bequests to close family members. Barro says that "the U.S. does not have schemes like Plan Colombia for countries that produce tobacoo or alcohol but for those produce cocaine/marijuanna/heroin" because the latter substances are illegal.
6. correctants: Correctants are offered to facilitate their own propositions. Barro proposes publicly funded school vouchers to children in families that are not rich and head-strat programs for poorer children, while
Becker suggests that the money economized from discontinuing the financial aid to Colombia could be used to fund health programs for drug users and education programs designed to diminish the demand for drugs.
文章標籤
全站熱搜
